Decision Theory

Overview

This hub tracks utility, preferences, risk, constraints, choice under uncertainty, and normative structure for agent design and evaluation.

Core Questions

  • How should preferences, uncertainty, constraints, and trade-offs be represented and compared?
  • Which assumptions about rationality, objectives, or risk are doing the real work in a paper?
  • How do decision-theoretic lenses apply across RL, strategic interaction, ethics, planning, and embodied systems?
  • How should interventions and strategic influence be evaluated when other agents learn in response?
  • How should agent abilities be represented when choices are embedded in temporal, causal, or coalition logics?
  • How should regret, dominance, and responsibility be compared when outcomes are value sets rather than scalar utilities?
  • Which equilibrium notions remain meaningful when feasible choices are jointly constrained by safety requirements?
  • How should policy choice be evaluated when other agents are adapting at the same time?
  • When should a rational agent defer to oversight rather than act directly, and how does that change in groups?
  • How should feasible action sets be restricted by safety filters while preserving useful reward optimization?
  • When should bounded agents be modeled as satisficers with aspiration thresholds rather than maximizers with explicit beliefs?
  • How should descriptive moral appraisal be separated from normative action selection when both are represented algebraically?
  • When is safety best represented as a hard feasible set, an expected-cost constraint, a population-level distributional constraint, or a runtime action filter?
  • When should probabilistic risk be spent as a live budget rather than collapsed into a hard feasible set?
  • What should an explanation of constrained choice reveal: the objective, the constraint, the risk model, or the intervention rule?
  • When is a shared team reward enough to justify decentralized execution, and when does credit assignment require a stronger factorization or centralized critic?
  • When should another agent’s incentive signal be treated as helpful information, strategic manipulation, or reward tampering?
  • How should agents choose under uncertainty over teammate type, subtask allocation, and partner goals?
  • When can sampled experience replace an explicit transition model while preserving optimal-control guarantees?
  • When should policy evaluation be treated as a counterfactual identification problem rather than a prediction problem?
  • When does a sequential decision problem require equilibrium reasoning over multiple value functions rather than optimization of one objective?
  • When can system-level choice be reduced to verified choices among reusable learned subsystems?
  • When does maximizing observed reward stop tracking true utility because the agent can corrupt the feedback process?
  • How should expected utility, equilibrium, and counterfactual evaluation interact when interventions change the game being played?
  • When does a decision system need simulated counterfactual distributions rather than identified average effects?
  • How should risk thresholds in AI safety specifications be chosen, audited, and verified?

Current Research Touchpoints

Key Concepts